Police pledge new pedestrian safety reforms, and to revisit collision cold case

|
(10)
Jikaiah Stevens after the collision that cost her over $100,000 in medical bills, as well as traumatic brain injury.
Photos courtesy of Jikaiah Stevens

One might call it the police’s act of contrition. At last night’s (Thu/16) meeting on pedestrian safety, Police Chief Greg Suhr promised to re-open a traffic collision case that left a 31-year-old woman with a traumatic brain injury, causing a loss in her sense of smell and taste, short term memory loss, insomnia, and a loss of motor skills.

Jikaiah Stevens was one of many pedestrians hit by a car last year in San Francisco, and luckily she survived. But she offered a scathing critique of the police’s handling of her case. Though witnesses said the driver ran a red light, the driver faced no consequences for hitting her, she said.

"What is their incentive to drive safely when there are no consequences?" Stevens asked the police chief. Suhr responded with a promise.

“If that driver was not issued a citation, that driver will be issued a citation,” Suhr said, to applause. 

Audio of Chief Greg Suhr pledging to revist Stevens' case, with a video interview with Natalie Burdick of Walk SF. 

Stevens was one of more than 50 public commenters who spoke at last night’s joint Police Commission and Board of Supervisors Neighborhood Services and Safety Committee meeting, and all sounded one message loud and clear: drivers can maim and kill pedestrians with near impunity in San Francisco, and that must end. 

Drivers must face consequences. 

“I’m here very simply to urge you to end the carnage on our streets,” said Natalie Burdick, membership and volunteer director at the nonprofit Walk SF. “These crimes cost the city millions annually, and untold value in terms of squandered human capital.”

Pedestrian deaths reached a high last year, with 21 walkers killed in traffic collisions. Sup. Eric Mar highlighted the lack of funding in Mayor Ed Lee’s Pedestrian Strategy. The documentation for the plan highlights a funding gap of $5-18 million. 

Though the mayor’s failures were touched on, most of the night turned into a persecution of the SFPD’s current policies around enforcing pedestrian safety. “The fact is these statistics have been consistent that two-thirds of pedestrian accidents are the fault of the driver,” Sup. Scott Wiener said at the outset of the meeting. “It’s the fact of the situation.” 

The SFPD has notoriously concentrated its ad campaigns and efforts on pedestrian behavior, not driver behavior, which last night it pledged to correct.

Leah Shahum, director of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, was especially scathing in her critique. She said the police have a bias towards cars, conscious or unconscious, and are often dismissive of bicyclists and pedestrians at the scene of a traffic collision. 

“Something is broken. Stories like Jikaiah's are more common than you think,” Shahum said.

But those looking to demonize the police would be sorely disappointed. To his credit, Suhr took most of the criticism right on the chin. He bluntly apologized for a series of missteps towards cyclists and pedestrians the police made recently.

He apologized for a failed investigation into the death of cyclist Amelie Le Moullac, 24, when a citizen found video evidence in the case that the police missed. “Our initial investigation was lacking,” Suhr said. “That was wrong.”

He assured the room that in the future, the SFPD would treat collision cases like criminal cases, right down to thorough evidence gathering.

Suhr then apologized for the behavior of Sgt. Richard Ernst, who interrupted Le Moullac’s memorial to lecture cyclists on safety procedures. “We’re better than that,” he said.

Apologies are one thing, but action is another. Cmdr. Mikail Ali announced the SFPD’s commitment to Sup. Jane Kim’s Vision Zero pedestrian safety plan, which pledges to aim for zero pedestrian collision deaths in San Francisco. 

sfpdstaff

Most of the SFPD's command staff and station captains were present for the entire meeting.

“Our goal for 2014 is to adopt Vision Zero for the calendar year,” Ali said. Part of that will include a “seismic shift” in policy around traffic citations, Suhr told the Guardian after the meeting. Traffic citations will increase, and more data tracking collisions, no matter how minor the injury, will be gathered. That last shift was at the urging of the SFBC’s Shahum, who Suhr called “no shrinking violet.”

Chief Greg Suhr addresses criticisms of the SFPD from the meeting, and commits to Vision Zero plan.

The majority of the SFPD’s command staff and station captains sat in attendance at the meeting last night, a deliberate move, Suhr said, to show them the need to shift how the SFPD handles pedestrian safety. 

“The big issue was, and a complaint I’ve heard over time was, how could there not be a ticket? How can something happen to me and nobody get a ticket?” Suhr told us. “People feel they’ve been less than served.”

“Now they’ve heard it straight,” Suhr said, referring to his command staff and station captains. 

Last night, the SFPD went on the record promising unprecedented changes in ensuring pedestrian safety. Now let’s hold them to it. 

Comments

Not least, not to jaywalk while staring at their cell phone, like the guy I saw this morning with a death wish, apparently.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 1:44 pm

an entire article by JFR that doesn't contain a cheap shot at techies and their (alleged) gentrification of SF! Kudos!

Posted by guest on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 2:05 pm

wow! what an unintelligent (as usual), off-topic comment. wow!

Posted by Guest on Jan. 18, 2014 @ 11:40 pm

For some reason this got cut off from my earlier comment:

"Last night, the SFPD went on the record promising unprecedented changes in ensuring pedestrian safety. Now let’s hold them to it."

From what I see, I'd say that most pedestrians don't care about their safety otherwise they wouldn't be squinting at their gadget screen while crossing the street, having not looked in either direction. They just walk right out in traffic. I saw a guy just missed being hit the other night at a busy intersection. He literally walked into the side of a vehicle as the vehicle passed. What was on that screen was far more important than his safety or life, apparently.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 18, 2014 @ 11:59 pm

It is hard believed there are so many Red Light Cameras which are the notorious safety cannot prevent and save people life. The more officers present on the street, the less Red Light Cameras and few accidents will be occurred in San Francisco.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 2:53 pm

Yes, it's like the London Blitz but with automobiles in the place of the Luftwaffe.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 8:59 pm

people who get off the bus and start running across the street behind the bus fifteen yards from the cross walk?

Posted by maybe a guest on Jan. 18, 2014 @ 7:11 am

We all know the main reason for all these accidents.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 18, 2014 @ 10:51 pm

Still waiting for the city's media to acknowledge that how city counts accidents is also "broken." The UC study found that the city hasn't been counting all the cycling accidents treated at SF General, the primary trauma center for the city. By relying only on police reports, the city may also be under-counting pedestrian and other accidents: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23032807

Posted by Rob Anderson on Jan. 21, 2014 @ 10:36 am

Leah Shahum of the bike coalition is demanding hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for special bike projects to socially engineer citizens into a cycling lifestyle that is not of their choosing. She uses her tax exempt non profit status to campaign and lobby for political candidates who will further her anti-car agenda.

We heard they expect 20% out of the next multi-billion dollar bond and tax measures SF wants taxpayers to pony up next November. They want us to vote to raise our annual car license fees to pay for their anti-car street diets and other supposedly safe street projects. They claim we owe them their share but they they should have to pay a penny for the streets they claim are theirs.

Remember this the next time the city of San Francisco requests more bonds to improve your driving experience. VOTE NO! If you drive a car, VOTE NO on any more funds for Muni or the San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency (SFMTA). Regardless of what they promise, the funds will be used against you to inflate parking prices, remove traffic lanes, slow traffic, and force you out of your car. If you voted No to a Wall on the Waterfront then please VOTE NO to any more funds for the SFMTA or Muni.

The next time you elect a Mayor, or a City Supervisor VOTE NO if they start parroting 'transit first" as an excuse to bleed your wallet. If your city Supervisor wants you to give up the safety of your family car to ride a bicycle on busy city streets then VOTE THEM OUT!

Posted by sfparkripoff on Mar. 01, 2014 @ 8:42 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Also from this author

  • Poll says SF loves tech buses, doesn't ask Spanish speakers

  • Boom for whom?

    Why isn't San Francisco's hot economy creating a budget surplus to address its costly byproducts?

  • A fine dilemma

    Increased citations often hinder homeless youth from finding better life